Is hate speech a criminal offense?

Hate speech is not a fixed, legally defined term. Our legal system places freedom of expression under the constitutional protection of Article 5 (1) of the German Basic Law (GG) and thus gives this right the highest priority. This includes not only value judgments, but also true factual assertions, insofar as they can serve to form opinions. Untrue statements of fact are not covered by the protection of Article 5 (1) GG. However, the right to freedom of expression does not apply without restriction: If human dignity is affected, the right of personality is violated or disparaging defamatory criticism is expressed, those affected can take legal action against this. The right to freedom of expression also takes a back seat if the criticism violates criminal law. The same applies if provisions for the protection of minors are violated.

Article 5 Basic Law: Freedom of Expression

(1) Everyone shall have the right freely to express and disseminate his opinions in speech, writing and pictures and to inform himself without hindrance from generally accessible sources. Freedom of the press and freedom of reporting by radio and film shall be guaranteed. There shall be no censorship.

(2) These rights shall be limited by the provisions of general law, the legal provisions for the protection of minors and the right to personal honor.

Offenses

Criminal content such as slander, insults and incitement to hatred are not covered by freedom of speech - regardless of whether statements are made online or offline. For example, hate speech can fulfill the following elements of the Criminal Code (StGB): § 111 Public incitement to commit a crime, § 130 Incitement of the people, § 185 Insult, § 186 Defamation, § 187 Defamation. Examples:

Insult under § 185 StGB
"Have fun fucking your incestuous mother, you bastard."

Incitementtohatredaccording to § 130 StGB
The offense of incitement to hatred comes into play when someone incites hatred or calls for violence against a person or group of persons on the basis of their membership in an ethnic group or religion in a way that is likely to disturb the public peace. Examples of racist posts whose authors have been fined for inciting hatred:

    "I'm in favor of reopening the gas chambers and putting the whole brood in there." - (4,800 € fine - AG Tiergarten Berlin Az. 259 Cs 218/15) "I hätt nu a Gasflasche und a Handgranate rumliegen [...]." - (7,500 € fine - AG Passau Az. 4 Ds 32 Js 12766/14).
   

However, not every racist comment is an incitement to hatred. In order for the courts to classify a comment as inciting the people, there must be a public. It therefore makes a difference whether a comment is made in private at a regulars' table or in the social media. On the Internet, the publicity and thus the pillorying effect is greater.

Digital Service Act (DSA)

Since February 17, 2024, the EU-wide Digital Services Act (DSA) has created a uniform legal framework for digital intermediary services. Platforms are held more accountable. The aim is to create a safer and fairer online world and protect citizens' fundamental rights. In January 2025, the Code of Conduct+ was also integrated into the DSA. This is an updated version of the EU Code of Conduct to combat illegal hate speech. The Code of Conduct+ requires, for example, the definition of hate speech as prohibited content by all signatories as well as a 24-hour deletion period for two thirds of all illegal content. Detailed information on the content is provided by Das NETTZ in Part 3 of the "Guide to #DSA" series: The Code of Conduct to Combat Illegal Hate Speech

More on the Digital Services Act can be found here: The Digital Services Act | Shaping Europe's digital future

Legal handle

What can be the consequence of a hate speech comment?

  • Private cease-and-desist letter
  • Out-of-court warning with a cease-and-desist declaration with penalty clause, possibly by letter from a lawyer
  • Civil injunction and/or award of damages, possibly even compensation for pain and suffering
  • Deletion of the comment on the platform
  • Reimbursement of the opposing party's legal fees
  • Payment of court costs
  • Criminal complaint/criminal conviction to a fine or prison sentence
  • Termination of the employment relationship
  • Temporary or permanent expulsion/suspension from school

How can I identify the authors?

Hate speech on the internet is often blatantly posted using real names, place of residence or employer address. Even anonymity through nicknames does not protect against prosecution. The authors almost always leave traces behind (IP address, name disclosure and photos in social networks), which enable subsequent identification.

What steps can I take as a victim?

If the hate comment is directed against you, the first step is to contact the platform provider and ask them to delete the comment. They should also consider legal options. The authors can be prosecuted under both civil and criminal law. In the case of serious hate speech comments, a criminal complaint can be filed. The police and the public prosecutor's office are responsible. In addition to the option of going directly to a police station, there is also the option of reporting hate comments via the online police stations of the federal states.

Where can I report violations of youth protection regulations?

Content that is harmful to minors can be reported to the two hotlines jugendschutz.net and internet-beschwerdestelle.de.

Network Enforcement Act

In order to encourage social network providers to process complaints about hate crime and other criminal content more quickly and comprehensively, the Act to Improve Law Enforcement in Social Networks (Network Enforcement Act, NetzDG for short) came into force on October 1, 2017. Since then, platform providers such as X, Facebook and YouTube have been obliged to remove or block "obviously criminal content" within 24 hours of receiving a complaint. If the operators systematically fail to meet their obligations, they face high fines. More information on the NetzDG can be found here.